Policy vs procedure: one rule written three ways

A policy says what must be true and why. A procedure says who does what, when and in which order, so that it is true. Below, one refund rule is written as a policy, as a procedure and as a work instruction, then the three are compared in one table.

Aspect Policy Procedure
Answers What must be true, and why Who does what, when, in which order
Owner The person accountable for the rule The lead of the team that does the work
Changes when The rule changes The people or hand-offs change
Wording "must", "may not" Roles as the subject of each step

The difference in one sentence

A policy states the rule and the reason for it; a procedure states who does what, in which order, to follow it.

  • A policy changes when the rule changes.
  • A procedure changes when the people or the hand-offs change.

The example on this page is Northwind, a made-up online shop with 12 people. Its support team refunds paid orders in the Paynest admin panel, as in Process documentation. Northwind has one rule about refunds: support refunds up to 200 EUR alone; above that, finance approves in the ticket first.

One rule written three ways

The same rule at three levels of detail. Each version points down to the next, and each one leaves out what the next one holds.

As a policy

Title
Refund approval policy
Purpose
Stop fraud and costly mistakes on large refunds.
Scope
Every refund issued by Northwind staff, through any channel.
Rule
A refund over 200 EUR must be approved by finance before it is issued. No one may approve their own refund.
Owner
Head of finance
Approved by
Managing director, 1 October 2026
Review
Every year, and whenever the threshold changes

About 70 words. It uses "must", and it names no software and no button on purpose: if Northwind moves from Paynest to another payment provider, the policy stays true and nobody has to approve it again.

As a procedure

Title
Refund a paid order
Policy
Refund approval policy
Owner
Support lead
Roles
Support agent; finance
Steps
  1. When a customer asks for a refund in a ticket, the support agent checks the order and the amount within 1 working day.
  2. If the amount is 200 EUR or less, the agent goes on to step 4.
  3. If it is over 200 EUR, the agent asks finance for approval in the ticket. Finance approves or rejects there within 1 working day, with a note on why.
  4. Before refunding, the agent checks that the order is paid, that the amount is not more than the order total and, over 200 EUR, that finance's approval is in the ticket.
  5. The agent issues the refund the same day, pastes the confirmation into the ticket and closes it.
  6. Every Friday, finance reconciles the week's refunds and checks that each one over 200 EUR has its approval in the ticket.

It names roles, an order, a trigger or deadline for each step and one decision point (step 2). It still names no tool and no button, and it fits on one page. Its owner is the support lead, because support does most of the work.

As a work instruction

Only the support agent's part, steps 4 and 5 of the procedure, as it is done in Paynest:

Title
Issue a refund on a paid order
Reader
The support agent, signed in to Paynest
Steps
  1. In Search orders, type the order number from the ticket, then click the order's row.
  2. Check that the order shows Paid, that the amount is not more than the order total and, over 200 EUR, that finance's approval is in the ticket. If a check fails, stop and reply in the ticket.
  3. Open Actions and choose Issue refund.
  4. In Refund note, type the reason from the ticket.
  5. Click Save refund. A saved refund cannot be taken back.
  6. Paste the refund confirmation into the ticket.
Done when
The order shows the refund, and its confirmation is in the ticket.

This is the document that changes when Paynest moves a button. The policy above does not change, and neither does the procedure. A screenshot of each step, with the clicked control marked, belongs in this version only. Where the line falls between an SOP and a work instruction is shown in SOP vs work instruction.

Side by side

Aspect Policy Procedure Work instruction
Answers What must be true, and why Who does what, when, in which order How exactly, step by step at the screen
Owner Head of finance Support lead The person who does the task
Approved by Managing director Head of finance Support lead
Reader Everyone who issues refunds, auditors The roles involved The person at the screen
Changes when The rule changes The people or hand-offs change The tool changes
Review Yearly When the roles change When the screen changes
Length here About 70 words About 140 words About 110 words
Wording "must", "may not" Roles as the subject of each step Imperative: "click", "type"

The owner, approver and review rows are Northwind's choice, not a standard.

SOP vs policy

A policy is the rule; an SOP is the written procedure that follows it.

An SOP is a procedure written down so it can be followed the same way every time. It sits under a policy, never beside it: the policy sets the rule, the SOP says who does what and when so the rule holds. In many small teams "SOP" means the step-by-step work instruction above, and the role-level procedure is never written down. That works until someone asks who approves what, and only the head of finance knows.

Is a procedure the same as an SOP? Nearly: an SOP is a procedure that has been written down, and in most document sets the two words name the same document. The click-by-click version is a separate document, the work instruction. How a procedure differs from the process above it is in Process vs procedure; what goes into an SOP is in What is an SOP.

Does a policy need a procedure

Not always. A policy that only allows or forbids something, such as "customer data is never sent from a personal email account", may need no procedure at all. There is nothing to do in order, only something not to do.

It needs one when someone has to act in a set order for the rule to hold, as with the refund approval. ComplianceBridge suggests weighing "the level of risk, complexity, and training needs associated with a topic" when deciding what goes in which document.

A procedure without a policy is common too: routine work with no rule behind it, such as a weekly sales export. A useful way to set up the set: each policy lists the procedures that carry it out, and each procedure names its policy, as the Northwind procedure does in its second field.

Two more document types sometimes sit between them. A standard turns a policy into a measurable requirement; as an illustration, not a definition, Northwind could set "refund requests are decided within 2 working days". A guideline recommends and does not oblige; PowerDMS calls guidelines "general recommendations. They're not mandatory or required."

Who approves policies and procedures

  • Policies are usually approved high up. At the University of Texas at Austin, a policy in the Handbook of Operating Procedures must "be approved by the president after completion of the HOP policy development process" (UT Austin).
  • Procedures are usually written by the managers whose teams follow them. IT Glue: "Managers of various departments can write procedures concerning the operations of their teams."
  • Review cycles: PowerDMS says to "review and update policies at least once a year". Procedures change more often; IT Glue calls them "subject to frequent adjustments and changes", for example when a new tool arrives.

No law and no ISO clause fixes one approval chain or review cycle for every organisation. Each document should name its own owner, approver and next review date, as the Northwind policy does.

Sources

All pages checked on .

  1. UT Austin Office of University Compliance Services: Policy vs. procedure. In its Handbook of Operating Procedures, a policy states what matters, why and who is responsible, and a procedure states who performs it, which steps, when and how; HOP policies are approved by the president.
  2. IT Glue: Policy vs. procedure. Managers write procedures; procedures change often, for example with a new tool.
  3. PowerDMS: What is a policy vs. a procedure. Review policies at least once a year; guidelines are not mandatory.
  4. ComplianceBridge: Criteria for creating a policy versus procedure. Risk, complexity and training needs as the test.